Competition between reps? Are you FOREAL?!


I was talking to a colleague in another tech company, an account executive. He was telling me about the culture in his sales team:

  • Reps not helping each other
  • People fighting over accounts
  • Reps comparing their quotas


I was like WHAT DA HELL... There is so much value in being more collaborative - sharing best practices, get coaching on how to get better, etc - everyone WINS!


Do I just work at a great company or is this type of culture more frequent than I think?


Seems pretty toxic...

๐Ÿงข Sales Management
๐Ÿฅ‡ Teamwork
๐Ÿ’ผ Productivity
19
CoorsKing
WR Officer
11
Retired King of the Coors Knights
It depends. At the company I am currently at, because of how frequently accounts shuffle and the holdover policies, it deters collaboration because you essentially hope they fuck up so it will roll to you. Now I will never ever sabotage a deal for someone else but the thought of someone slipping a deal worth a third of my quota and I get a layup, is enticing. It is unfortunate that that is the reality.

I think it comes down to the business prioritizing profits over people. Do you want to be a profit machine or do you want to be a fun place to work? You can have a mix of both, but never 100% of each so it just depends where each company falls on that sliding scale.
Sunbunny31
Politicker
3
Sr Sales Executive ๐Ÿฐ
I used to work for a company just like that - and there was zero reward for being collaborative and a good "team player".ย  ย Accounts rolled over annually at a minimum.ย  Honestly, I don't know why they haven't figured out that reworking territories and accounts every single year is literally costing them business when relationships and account knowledge have to be rebuilt over and over, but I'm glad to be away from that.
CoorsKing
WR Officer
2
Retired King of the Coors Knights
Yeahโ€ฆ I have been spending the last few weeks repairing some fire drills caused by people burning shit down last minute to try and nickel and dime accounts before they lose themย 
UrAssIsSaaS
Arsonist
10
SaaS Eater
Way more frequent than you think. Usually at companies that are a sinking ship but I dont think its particularly rare.
CoorsKing
WR Officer
6
Retired King of the Coors Knights
Either a sinking ship or clearly established market leader trying to maximize profits at any cost
UrAssIsSaaS
Arsonist
3
SaaS Eater
Good point.ย 
ZEnabler
Good Citizen
0
CEO of Sales
Not sustainable, right? Especially when sales reps jump ship super easily and companies are investing a lot in keeping their team happy. Thoughts?
CoorsKing
WR Officer
3
Retired King of the Coors Knights
Nah not if you are a big name company that pays well. There are always more people that want to work there
CuriousFox
WR Officer
5
๐ŸฆŠ
We have nothing to gain other than a shitty reputation when we don't help each other. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
SaaSam
Politicker
4
Account Executive
It's a pretty frequent culture depending on industry and product. Some companies have pretty cutthroat sales cultures. Last company I was at was very much this way. No territories, really just a mad dash to "own" companies that you're prospecting into.

IMO if you're sales team isn't competitive, you're doing it wrong. But I'm talking healthy competition, not this "keep everything secret so I can fuck everyone over and come out on top" competition. More of the "buddies trying to one-up each other" kind.
ZEnabler
Good Citizen
2
CEO of Sales
There is definitely a way to make this a healthy competition. People pushing themselves up, vs. dragging each other down!
Pachacuti
Politicker
2
They call me Daddy, Sales Daddy
Been there. It sucks and you see it far too frequently. Lots of managers, especially those who never carried a bag, think that putting reps against each other is a great way to run a sales team.
ZEnabler
Good Citizen
1
CEO of Sales
That's super unfortunate - culture starts from the top...
TennisandSales
Politicker
2
Head Of Sales
totally common.ย 

The best cultureย  I have ever been in was when we had team selling model.ย 

We had a team quota and everyone got paid on every deal that was closed.ย 

(if you ask me to explain the comp structure I will but its complicated and annoying haha)ย 

But this TRULY aligned the team. we all wanted to close deals but if you closed some and I didnt....i still got paid.ย 

it was awesome.ย 
ZEnabler
Good Citizen
1
CEO of Sales
Inspiring to hear @TennisandSalesย !
ZEnabler
Good Citizen
1
CEO of Sales
Quick question for you@TennisandSales:
How have you seen reps collaborate with each other when that model is in place?
TennisandSales
Politicker
2
Head Of Sales
Reps are more open to sharing and receiving feedback since its not as cut throat vs the other ppl on the team.ย 

Also everyone can truly celebrate other peoples wins which is nice.ย 

Also there is a lot less fighting over accounts and territory.ย 
DatSaaS
Executive
1
Sales Executive
Does this model ever end with someone not pulling their weight or under performing?
TennisandSales
Politicker
0
Head Of Sales
yes. but so does every model. no matter how you slice it I do believe that 80% of the production comes from 20% of the team.ย 

so it is up to the manager to really help improve the ones that need help.ย 

i believe it is actually easier to do this when those under performing are still making money.ย 

because they will feel like they have time to make changes that may take a while to see results.ย 

now the whole comp model has to be changed. Everyone gets paid on every deal but not everyone makes the same %. its all based on their OTE
Justatitle
Big Shot
2
Account Executive
Really is a case by case basis, The structure of the accounts, how sales reps are fed leads, I do think a collaborative environment wins each and every time.ย 
NotCreativeEnough
Big Shot
1
Professional Day Ruiner
Companies with clearly defined territories that aren't always changing is definitely the way. It encourages collaboration and healthy competition as opposed to an environment like you mentioned. Everyone knows who their accounts are, what area they cover, and what their quota is. There is no benefit to screwing over another rep.ย 
CRAG112
Valued Contributor
1
Account Executive
What's your company name and how do I apply? I yearn for zero toxic Republican anti-worker BS.
Corpslovechild
Politicker
1
Inbound Sales Manager
I would quit, I wouldn't want to work for that company.
JustGonnaSendIt
Politicker
0
Burn Towns, Get Money
Seems like a cultural issue. Defining it as toxic is really a matter of perspective and how the company culture aligns with your principles.

I choose to look at my role as an AE as a steward of a particular territory or list of accounts.

I've received several shit territories over the years and have done my best to build them up to a place where if I inherited them, I'd be excited about it. So far this has served me well in terms of income and career advancement.

I intentionally chose cultures that look at things the same way when I join a new company. It's never 100%, but as long as it's the prevailing view on my team, so far this has been an effective approach.

Plenty of reps that are short-term focused and work well in organizations with the culture you've described. They are usually more transactional people and organizations, selling more transactional products.
10XQLA
Politicker
0
Medical Sales Assassin
Unfortunately, this is still an active form of old-school boiler room BS. and it is alive and well!!!!
6

Do you know the names of reps from your competitors?

Question
11
6

Reps that change companies often

Discussion
11
8

Manager utilizing top reps to manage team

Advice
12