Ive talked with a handful of folks about this concept. Im a very big supporter of having discovery and demo be two separate calls for a few reasons:
- You allow your self time to really understand what is going on. The first problem people bring up is not normally the true need so having time to have an actual conversation and figure out what they are REALLY looking for is a big deal.
- This allows for a better demo experience. If you know what you are doing you should be able to take the info you get on the disco call and apply it to the demo. This will make a bigger impact for the prospect and give you a better shot at winning the deal.
- If you run the discovery call well it shows the buyer that you know what you are doing and understand how to help them.
If you get push back from prospects, and they just want to see a demo I say something like:
"I am more than happy to show you the product, many groups I speak to find it helpful to have a 20 - 30 minute chat before hand to make sure you understand exactly what we offer and for my team to better understand you needs. This way you know you wont be wasting your time or your teams time when we set up a demo. Does that sound fair enough?"
If your product is a lower ACV and does not require much work then Maybe you can disco and demo in the same call but you should be able to do a DEEP dive of the product in 30 minutes or less for this to work IMO.
Has anyone made a switch from a 1 call process to splitting this up into two calls? What have been the results?
44 comments