Discovery and Demo should be separate calls

Ive talked with a handful of folks about this concept. Im a very big supporter of having discovery and demo be two separate calls for a few reasons:


  1. You allow your self time to really understand what is going on. The first problem people bring up is not normally the true need so having time to have an actual conversation and figure out what they are REALLY looking for is a big deal.
  2. This allows for a better demo experience. If you know what you are doing you should be able to take the info you get on the disco call and apply it to the demo. This will make a bigger impact for the prospect and give you a better shot at winning the deal.
  3. If you run the discovery call well it shows the buyer that you know what you are doing and understand how to help them.

If you get push back from prospects, and they just want to see a demo I say something like:

"I am more than happy to show you the product, many groups I speak to find it helpful to have a 20 - 30 minute chat before hand to make sure you understand exactly what we offer and for my team to better understand you needs. This way you know you wont be wasting your time or your teams time when we set up a demo. Does that sound fair enough?"


If your product is a lower ACV and does not require much work then Maybe you can disco and demo in the same call but you should be able to do a DEEP dive of the product in 30 minutes or less for this to work IMO.


Has anyone made a switch from a 1 call process to splitting this up into two calls? What have been the results?

๐Ÿ‘‘ Sales Strategy
๐Ÿ“ฃ Demos
โ˜‘๏ธ Qualification Calls
22
Kosta_Konfucius
Politicker
6
ERP Sales
100% agree with this post. After reading the title I was going to bring up on more transactional/less expensive smb deals I did in the past would demo in the disco. It was a simple product which I can show them the tool and a specific feature they didnโ€™t understand.

But I would never demo in the disco for more complex products
UrAssIsSaaS
Arsonist
3
SaaS Eater
My thoughts exactly, if its small, simple, or transactional (or all of the above) it should be on one call. Gotta strike while the iron is hot.

Anything else it should be separate.
TennisandSales
Politicker
2
Head Of Sales
yep i agree. I once went from a more complicated product to a very transactional product, and i actually shot my self in the foot a few times trying to make the process more complicated then it needed to be haha
UrAssIsSaaS
Arsonist
1
SaaS Eater
Keep it simple stupid
CuriousFox
WR Officer
1
๐ŸฆŠ
Yeah, stupid. ๐Ÿฆก๐Ÿงฟ
TennisandSales
Politicker
2
Head Of Sales
yeah totally agree.
I think this could be a good thing to look out for as an AE.

if the company wants to you "one call close" or demo and disco on the same call, its probably a very simple product and not a huge need for an AE long term.
Gasty
Notable Contributor
6
War Room Community Manager
can't see how any other way can be successful.
TennisandSales
Politicker
1
Head Of Sales
๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿ™Œ
jefe
Arsonist
3
๐Ÿ
ALWAYS
TennisandSales
Politicker
2
Head Of Sales
๐Ÿ’ฏ
Pachacuti
Politicker
3
They call me Daddy, Sales Daddy
Always at least 2 separate calls, if not more. Discovery is a never ending process. I tell people โ€œ my demo is 8 hours long because I cover everything we do. If we do some mutual Q&A first then itโ€™s 1-2 hours.โ€ They like that better.
TennisandSales
Politicker
2
Head Of Sales
haha! wow i love this im totally going to steal that.
boredAnti
Tycoon
2
That One Guy
I agree with this, however, for how my company and our product is set up, as we are in the hospitality vertical and meeting held ratio is lower than most places I have worked due to staffing issues, we don't get the opportunity to schedule different meetings. With that being said, our platform makes it easy to integrate it as part of the conversation and discovery to uncover their pain points.
TennisandSales
Politicker
2
Head Of Sales
hmm yeah that can be a struggle. I would push back and say that the customer doesnt see enough of a reason to have two calls. if its important enough, they will make it happen.
Sunbunny31
Arsonist
2
Sr Sales Executive ๐Ÿฐ
At LEAST two calls. Sometimes for us it's the qualification call/Discovery call (led by AE)/pre-demo call (including SC) and then the demo. If that's cumbersome, we have combined pre-demo with discovery, or eliminated the pre-demo call entirely.

The more you know that goes beyond "I want to learn about x solution you're selling", the better off you will be.
TennisandSales
Politicker
2
Head Of Sales
yes 100%!

I have many times run a process that is more like:
- disco call
-pre demo sync
- initial demo
- Demo debrief call
- 2nd demo (deep dive on one aspect)
- 3rd demo (deep dive on separate aspect)
- pricing call
- integration call
- pre implementation call
Sign contract
-hand off call
Sunbunny31
Arsonist
2
Sr Sales Executive ๐Ÿฐ
I should also mention that these are for enterprise sales - when you are dealing with potentially large ARR in a complex environment. If I was to be dealing with a smaller company, I would try to collapse the steps a bit and not annoy the customer. Enterprise customers get it and the deals are complicated enough to require many meetings.
TennisandSales
Politicker
1
Head Of Sales
great point. that deal structure above has been for TCV of $500k and up.

The $6000 deal is NOT getting that many meetings haha
Sunbunny31
Arsonist
2
Sr Sales Executive ๐Ÿฐ
Only if you want to make your SE and the rest of your team LOATHE you.
TennisandSales
Politicker
0
Head Of Sales
haha and my boss!
adrienmc
Good Citizen
2
Founder @LaGrowthMachine
As always, it really depends on what youโ€™re selling and its level of complexity (which is usually translated into the ACV).

For context, our ACV is fairly small (8kโ‚ฌ / year for SMB & 20kโ‚ฌ for enterprise) as we sell a sales automation software.

We went from 1h discovery + demo call into the same call TO 1h grouped demos every Tuesday followed by a 45min discovery + deep-dive call if demo confirms interests.

Deep-dive is different to demo with the grouped tour, people have a strong understanding of what they can do, and we can focus on solving their objections and tailoring their experience to their current problems (saving time on generic stuff with the grouped session).

We did that move because we had too many inbound requests to handle (weโ€™re a bootstrapped company so not a big subsidized sales team) and couldnโ€™t keep up with demo requests.

Stats wise, we went from a 31% conversion rate to clients after a discovery + demo to 21% conversion rate to clients after the grouped tour.

Bare in mind that not all people from the product tour will be offered a discovery + deep-dive call afterwards : itโ€™s reserved for high plans prospects.

Also, we now have virtually no limit to the number of people being onboarded now compared to the human ressources constrained approach of individual demos.

We documented everything for those that have a similar sales complexity/cycle and would be interested in knowing more https://help.lagrowthmachine.com/en/articles/5101209-mastering-webinar-the-full-guide-to-a-successful-webinar-strategy
TennisandSales
Politicker
1
Head Of Sales
very interesting process. thats drop in conversion rate is not surprising to me.
adrienmc
Good Citizen
1
Founder @LaGrowthMachine
We expected the drop. But I was surprised it was not any higher actually!
TennisandSales
Politicker
0
Head Of Sales
why not make the qualification form/demo form more restrictive and see if you got a better quality lead ?
adrienmc
Good Citizen
1
Founder @LaGrowthMachine
So the 21% conversion rate post grouped demo (hosted by the sales team obviouslyโœŠ) accounts for everyone attending the product tour. So it does include SMBs for which we donโ€™t provide a dedicated 1:1 discovery + deep-dive.

If we were to compare the conversion rate of individual meetings in both approach, grouped session followed by deep-dive has a higher closing rate though I havenโ€™t done the math lately. But Iโ€™m probably missing out on leads that will not agree on joining a grouped session.

Though generally, when explained that itโ€™s the only way to make sure not to wait for a long time before getting a meeting, people are really understanding. And anyway, these demanding leads are offset by the sheer number of people we care onboarded in one hour with a grouped session

So the conclusion of the experiment is mostly that it wasnโ€™t as valuable as we thought to host individual demos, rather a product session for the generic stuff and a dedicated deep-dive for specific valuable accounts
TennisandSales
Politicker
0
Head Of Sales
ahhh I see. vey very interesting. ive neve seen a group demo approach before. glad its working for you!
SaaSguy
Tycoon
2
Account Executive
If they push back that they want a demo I just ask them which of our half dozen products/version of our product they want. They always shut up then and let me ask my questions and then I can help them get the right product.
TennisandSales
Politicker
1
Head Of Sales
hahaha another solid approach.
ChickenDinner
Politicker
2
Account Executive
2 calls for sure. I'm in the SMB and often have people saying "Oh I thought this was gonna be a demo" and they always tempt me to shorten it but I always try to stay strong. Prescribing before you properly diagnose is malpractice
TennisandSales
Politicker
0
Head Of Sales
why do they think its going to be a demo? because thats not a good thing that they get something different than they expect haha
roftheyear
Opinionated
0
Account Executive
i hate it when they do that. it's like you were told on the phone this was going be a call about you. why are you expecting a fucking demo and a quote?
DungeonsNDemos
Big Shot
2
Rolling 20's all day
I find it's extra important to be selective with how I phrase the fact that we are only having a discovery call first - so I completely agree.
TennisandSales
Politicker
0
Head Of Sales
YES! you have to be very specific with your words in out reach so you dont set the wrong expectation. I use to screw this up all the time in financial services people would think its a meet and greet and them im trying to do a full on discovery. never went well
butwhy
Politicker
1
Solutions Engineer
LOUDER FOR THE SALES REPS IN THE BACK!
TennisandSales
Politicker
1
Head Of Sales
๐Ÿ“ฃ๐Ÿ“ฃ๐Ÿ“ฃ๐Ÿ“ฃ๐Ÿ“ฃ๐Ÿ“ฃ
GDO
Politicker
1
BDM
Yes! You need time to prep a fitting demo
TennisandSales
Politicker
1
Head Of Sales
I use to NOT think this way...then I realized the product I was selling at the time was just super simple and no need for much thought haha
salezkween
Opinionated
1
Enterprise Account Executive
I give them a snack. Identify top priority, show them ideal state of that specific problem. Get feedback ask for deeper dive
TennisandSales
Politicker
1
Head Of Sales
haha start off with a snack before the main course!
payton_pritchard
Executive
1
RSM
100% agree that this is ideal, but more and more I'm struggling with this.

With the rise of PLG/freemium sales models and the increase in available information to buyers I'm starting to feel that gating demos with discover may be a disadvantage.

What's the real benefit to them -- yes if we're doing a good job as sales reps, we should be teaching them something in discovery, uncovering problems, and all of that -- but how often does that really happen?

There's a huge benefit for us as sellers to getting good discovery on a stand-alone call but is that really the way people want to buy, and if the alternative is a competitive solution with no sales gates does forcing discovery risk losing opps?
TennisandSales
Politicker
1
Head Of Sales
great great points. if you do not have anything to offer, then dont get in the way of the buyer. i 100% agree with this.

if your discovery is just another step that serves you more than the customer there is something wrong.

in my experience i havnt had to "gate demos" with a discovery call. its a needed step to make sure the prospect get the most out of the demo. especially when the demo involved 5+ leaders.
ChumpChange
Politicker
1
Channel Manager
Depends on the sales velocity. More transactional/less complex deals/products... you can pivot from disco to demo pretty seamlessly. Complex deals need to be segmented into two separate sales motions.
TennisandSales
Politicker
0
Head Of Sales
yes deal size and structure come into play for sure.
NotCreativeEnough
Big Shot
0
Professional Day Ruiner
I agree when it comes to larger/more complex deals with longer sales cycles. I've worked at companies before with smaller deal sizes and much faster sales cycles where I would disagree though. My first SaaS sales job was almost entirely a 1 call close type of situation. SDR would set the meeting, then 70% of your deals were generally from that first call. Qualification and demo combined took about 30-45 minutes. Average ACV was about 3k billed monthly.
7

Discovery - does it need a separate meeting?

Question
8
Discovery
21% I do it by email before we meet. The meeting is a pitch.
39% I do it as part of the pitch meeting.
40% I have a discovery meeting that is separate from the pitch.
70 people voted
5

How do you start your discovery calls?

Question
8
14

Discovery or Demo on the first call?

Question
16