I wonder how common this is in orgs that we do not hear about? What do you think is the percentage of people cut?
My organisation is going through yearly redundancy rounds... Bigger than anything anyone has seen before so essentially layoffs. I wonder why with some companies it's immediately in the news and in others it's not? Is it just the way things are done in say Salesforce, IBM and other 20-40 year old organisations? Is it because they can't take bad press?
My org looks to have cut somewhere at least 5% this year. Essentially a lot of people also who were recently on paternity or maternity leave got axed which to me seems unethical. And the departments and roles are there, just people being swapped in with lower salaries.
I'll end on a bright note, apparently in 2013 Nintendo CEO decided there'd be no layoffs and he took 50% salary cut and all board members took 20% salary cut. I would do it. I wonder why more CEOs don't
36 comments