Value 4 Value vs Traditional Advertising: Improving Connections Between Creators and Their Audiences

The amount of content creators have grown tremendously over the past few years, and with that growth comes the inevitable question of monetization. Two primary methods have emerged: traditional advertising and the more recent Value 4 Value (V4V) model. In this discussion thread I'd like to explore the drawbacks of both methods and consider how the V4V model might enhance the connection between creators and their audiences by eliminating unnecessary middlemen.


Traditional Advertising: Traditional advertising involves creators securing sponsorship deals with companies to promote products or services during their show. While this method can generate significant revenue, it comes with several drawbacks:


Loss of authenticity: Integrating ads into a podcast can make content creators appear less genuine and more focused on profit than on delivering quality content.


Advertiser influence: Advertisers may exert control over a podcast's content, potentially limiting creative freedom and stifling important conversations.


Audience disengagement: Listeners may become disinterested or annoyed by ads, leading to a loss of engagement and a potential drop in listenership.


Value 4 Value (V4V) Model: The V4V model emphasizes a direct exchange between content creators and their audience. Instead of relying on ads, podcasters receive financial support, resources, or services directly from their listeners. This model aims to create a more sustainable and authentic relationship between podcasters and their audience, but it is not without its challenges:


Income instability: The V4V model may not provide a consistent income, making it challenging for podcasters to rely solely on listener contributions.


Scaling difficulty: As a podcast grows, managing direct support from a large audience may become increasingly complex and time-consuming.


Improving Connections with V4V: Despite its challenges, the V4V model has the potential to significantly improve the connection between podcasters and their audience:


Elimination of middlemen: By receiving support directly from their listeners, podcasters can avoid the influence of advertisers and maintain full control over their content.


Enhanced authenticity: Podcasters can focus on producing high-quality content that resonates with their audience, rather than catering to the demands of advertisers.


Audience investment: When listeners contribute directly to a podcast, they become more invested in its success, fostering a stronger sense of community and loyalty.


Tailored content: With direct feedback and support from their audience, podcasters can better understand their listeners' preferences and create content that truly meets their needs.


Personally, I've been enjoying Fountain to do value 4 value with the podcasts I enjoy, and would love to hear others savages thoughts on this topic๐Ÿค

๐Ÿฑ Off-Topic
๐Ÿ’ฐ Compensation
๐ŸŽ™ Interviews/Podcasts
4
detectivegibbles
Politicker
3
Sales Director
I may be missing the boat here...

What exactly are you asking? If other war room members enjoy podcasts that aren't on certain platforms?

Can you give examples of each?
Chep
WR Officer
0
Bitcoin Adoption Specialist
Fair shouldโ€™ve been more clear. The crux of my question is how other war room members see revenue being generated from content creators in the future. If ads will remain dominant, if we will see more value 4 value type content, or if a new field may emerge which I havenโ€™t thought of or seen which allows creators to be compensated for their work
detectivegibbles
Politicker
2
Sales Director
Wonder if @GeneralCorpcan jump in to give his thoughts on this...
HVACexpert
Politicker
0
sales engineer
Obviously there are some I like, but a lot of โ€˜influencersโ€™ most I donโ€™t even trust the messaging
Sunbunny31
Politicker
1
Sr Sales Executive ๐Ÿฐ
Yeah, totally outside my realm of expertise, and I'm struggling to see how this relates to sales. Sorry.
oldcloser
Arsonist
1
๐Ÿ’€
This well articulated pontification is nowhere near m personal wheelhouse. TL/DR version would help with the crux.
Kosta_Konfucius
Politicker
1
Sales Rep
So are you saying V4V is similar to twitch streamers where they receive donations, do you think LinkedIn will make the switch to that?
Chep
WR Officer
1
Bitcoin Adoption Specialist
Yes similar idea but I think fiat struggles with micropayments because moving a penny is more expensive for these companies to do than the actual penny. Of course on twitch you can donate 1 dollar or more. However some people are hesitant to donate anything more than spare change. Where as with something like Nostr you can send 10 satoshis which is less than a penny for 1 Satoshi or in some cases for free. So Iโ€™m very excited about protocols like Nostr using bitcoin to make micropayments both possible and a fun way to send a sat or something rather than a like. I know 10 sats is almost nothing considering itโ€™s less than a penny but if 1000 people send you 10 sats consistently that adds up
CuriousFox
WR Officer
1
๐ŸฆŠ
๐ŸŒถ๐Ÿ”ฅ
Maximas
Tycoon
0
Senior Sales Executive
Nice thread, believe that PROS vs CONS are as below
TA 50:50
V4V 75:25
17
Members only

Selling to CISOs and CIOs in my new role, did not anticipate how well guarded they are..

Question
31
8

SDRs/AEs who have experience selling across various industries: Which ones have you found to be most fulfilling (pay, benefits, commission etc.) and which would you say are not worth the time and effort?

Question
12
8

Most important value propositions and numbers in sales pitch? edtech to K12 schools

Question
7