I was thinking about this because I have a deal that, while nothing is guaranteed, should very well close in September. It was actually supposed to close in June and I was intro'd to procurement and we had negotiated a 10% discount for a Q2 signature. They flaked for a variety of raasons but since then we have done, a 2nd trial, they've hired someone senior for the specific role of managing this solution and are planning an executive presentation late August to put the final bow on the project.
It got me thinking, when I get re-intro'd to that procurement person in September and they want their same 10%, why should I give it to them? They fucked me in June. After this last presentation there's no way they would kill the project. We've been working on it since March, multiple trials, multiple demos, multiple stakeholders appeased - what power does this procurement guy really have? He's going to piss off the whole company that wants to get this started because I won't give him his 10%. I do find I am often soft and will be happy to just give the 10 to get the deal done but I am thinking what would really be the risk in standing first after all that's happened.
Any thoughts?
9 comments