In my experience, companies who grow through acquisition vs focusing on organic growth are seen as ‘old school’ with large ambitions that are poorly executed because of the complexities of truly integrating the business and leveraging it for the mutual benefit of the entire portfolio.
Is growth through acquisition typically seen in negative light because it indicates creative bankruptcy regarding organic growth for the core product, accompanied by a measure of hacking & slashing within the newly acquired org? Or, is this just my takeaway based on what I’ve seen and heard?
16 comments